<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Give &#8216;Em Hell, Mike Gravel</title>
	<atom:link href="http://skunkcabbage.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/give-em-hell-mike-gravel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://skunkcabbage.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/give-em-hell-mike-gravel/</link>
	<description>soup and books</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:38:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: skunkcabbage</title>
		<link>http://skunkcabbage.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/give-em-hell-mike-gravel/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>skunkcabbage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Apr 2007 15:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skunkcabbage.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/give-em-hell-mike-gravel/#comment-251</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I enjoy the angry grandpa delivery, too. If you go to Gravel&#039;s web site it mentions that he filibustered Nixen for 5 months to end the Viet Nam draft. Direct democracy stuff is interesting, but I&#039;m itchy about a sales tax rather than income tax.

The Biden &quot;yes&quot; was pretty good. He has some charisma. 

Kucinich whipping it out was a bit melodramatic, but if he doesn&#039;t grandstand (and possibly even if he does) the press will disappear him in summaries of the debate. Clinton really said nothing worthwhile. It&#039;s interesting to watch the bourgeois press eat her up. Serious about war and business, really, what&#039;s not to like from their perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I enjoy the angry grandpa delivery, too. If you go to Gravel&#8217;s web site it mentions that he filibustered Nixen for 5 months to end the Viet Nam draft. Direct democracy stuff is interesting, but I&#8217;m itchy about a sales tax rather than income tax.</p>
<p>The Biden &#8220;yes&#8221; was pretty good. He has some charisma. </p>
<p>Kucinich whipping it out was a bit melodramatic, but if he doesn&#8217;t grandstand (and possibly even if he does) the press will disappear him in summaries of the debate. Clinton really said nothing worthwhile. It&#8217;s interesting to watch the bourgeois press eat her up. Serious about war and business, really, what&#8217;s not to like from their perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cerebraljetsam</title>
		<link>http://skunkcabbage.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/give-em-hell-mike-gravel/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>cerebraljetsam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://skunkcabbage.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/give-em-hell-mike-gravel/#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Gravel: very funny man! Sadly, the drunken-angry-grandpa-chastising-grandchildren form of delivery probably obscured the fact he had some really good things to say. Makes me want to hear him speak more often (sadly not because I think he is a good politician--more in a way that I like to listen to Lewis Black).

I gotta say, though, the prize for the wittiest answer goes to Biden&#039;s &quot;yes.&quot;

Re: Obama and Clinton from the perspective of the MSNBC post-debate analysis: &quot;Clinton is in politics grad school, whereas the debate has shown that all the other people are still undergrads.&quot; Hmmm... Even Pat Buchanan praised her in the highest tones, but that is obviously tainted by ulterior motives. In any case, I do have to agree that I was somewhat disappointed by Obama. Kucinich was good, but too often his solid arguments were overshadowed by what seemed to be a too artificial and staged delivery (see the &quot;look at me holding the constituion&quot; bit). A bit too over the top for me, making it too theatrical, hence diverting attention from his great arguments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gravel: very funny man! Sadly, the drunken-angry-grandpa-chastising-grandchildren form of delivery probably obscured the fact he had some really good things to say. Makes me want to hear him speak more often (sadly not because I think he is a good politician&#8211;more in a way that I like to listen to Lewis Black).</p>
<p>I gotta say, though, the prize for the wittiest answer goes to Biden&#8217;s &#8220;yes.&#8221;</p>
<p>Re: Obama and Clinton from the perspective of the MSNBC post-debate analysis: &#8220;Clinton is in politics grad school, whereas the debate has shown that all the other people are still undergrads.&#8221; Hmmm&#8230; Even Pat Buchanan praised her in the highest tones, but that is obviously tainted by ulterior motives. In any case, I do have to agree that I was somewhat disappointed by Obama. Kucinich was good, but too often his solid arguments were overshadowed by what seemed to be a too artificial and staged delivery (see the &#8220;look at me holding the constituion&#8221; bit). A bit too over the top for me, making it too theatrical, hence diverting attention from his great arguments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
